How does Superinsight handle rules that differ by state?

Workers' compensation regulations differ by state, so the review applies the rules of the state the claim sits in. Findings do not stop at a citation to the medical record: the state regulations and guidelines that support the position are cited alongside it.

Can it separate a pre-existing condition from a work-related aggravation?

Yes, and that distinction is usually the case. The chronology places treatment before and after the reported injury on one timeline with each entry quoted and cited, so an aggravation is argued from the record rather than asserted over it.

What about MMI and impairment ratings?

The entries that speak to maximum medical improvement, work restrictions, and impairment are surfaced with the treating source and the page they came from, so the documentation supporting a rating is assembled rather than reconstructed.

Can it handle a file with many treating providers?

Yes. Records from every provider are read into one timeline, which is where inconsistencies between them become visible, such as the same week described two ways, or a restriction that one provider lifted and another kept.

Evaluating cases is free, with no limit on the number of cases or pages, and the chronology updates each time new records arrive. When you want to go further on a file, a monthly plan starts at $250.

How does the review protect worker privacy?

The review is an AI first pass on HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, verified by your own attorneys rather than outside human reviewers, so a worker's records are never routed to a third-party review team. Superinsight is HIPAA compliant, ISO 42001 certified for responsible AI management, and SOC 2 audited.

How does your reliable AI system improve workers' compensation claims?

Our AI technology meticulously analyzes medical records to identify critical elements that impact workers' compensation claims, including causation evidence, treatment appropriateness, pre-existing conditions, MMI indicators, and impairment rating documentation. This systematic approach ensures that all claim-relevant medical information is properly identified and documented.

How does your reliable AI approach protect worker privacy?

The review runs as an AI first pass, with verification by your own attorneys rather than outside human reviewers, so workers' sensitive medical information is never exposed to third parties. All data is processed by our secure AI system on HIPAA-compliant infrastructure with advanced encryption, eliminating privacy concerns associated with traditional review services.

How does your service help overcome workers' comp claim denials?

We identify overlooked medical evidence that establishes work-relatedness, document the full extent of injuries, and create comprehensive reports addressing specific reasons for denial, greatly enhancing appeal success rates.

Can you distinguish between pre-existing conditions and work-related aggravations?

Yes, our system is specifically designed to identify medical evidence that differentiates pre-existing conditions from workplace exacerbations, a critical distinction in workers' compensation cases.

How do you handle complex cases with multiple treating providers?

Our AI technology excels at synthesizing information from multiple providers into a coherent medical narrative, identifying inconsistencies, and highlighting key documentation that supports the workers' compensation claim.

Practice area · Workers' compensation

State rules cited alongside the records

Comp rules change at the state line, so the review does too. Superinsight evaluates every case at no cost and returns a chronology that quotes the records, cites the page, and points to the state regulations and guidelines that support the position.

Start a free evaluation Book a demo

No limit on cases or records. Subscribe from $250 a month when you decide to go further.

Chronology 964 pages reviewed

Apr 4, 2024

Occupational clinic — date of injury

“Shoulder injured lifting at work; reported to supervisor same shift.”

Ex. 1, p. 12

Jun 20, 2024

Orthopedic evaluation — restrictions issued

“No overhead lifting; modified duty for six weeks.”

Ex. 4, p. 208

Jul–Sep

Restriction conflict between providers

One treating physician lifts the restriction while another keeps it in place.

Nov 12, 2024

MMI declared

“Patient at maximum medical improvement; permanent impairment assessed.”

Ex. 9, p. 611

Illustrative example. The records shown are not from a real case.

What you get

Your comp file, organized and cited to the state rules that govern it

Work-relatedness, from the record

The first report of injury read together with everything that followed, so causation is supported by entries you can point to.

Prior injuries and apportionment separated out

We separate treatment before the work injury from treatment after it, so you have the records to support or challenge apportionment.

MMI and impairment documentation

We pull together work restrictions, changes in work status, and the findings behind an impairment rating, and cite the source for each one. Ratings are checked against the AMA Guides edition your state uses.

State rules cited too

The regulations and guidelines of the state the claim sits in, cited alongside the medical evidence they apply to.

Multiple providers, one timeline

Every treating source in sequence, which is what makes a contradiction between two of them visible instead of buried.

Answers for the denial letter

Put the carrier's stated reasons to the record and get answers with citations, so an appeal responds to the file rather than to the letter.

Free for law firms

Evaluate every comp case. Pay only when you decide to proceed.

Comp attorneys turn down a lot of files, and the turning down is itself the expensive part. Superinsight evaluates every case at no cost so that decision is made against the record, and an expert can be brought in when a file needs testimony.

A free chronology on every case, with no cap on cases or pages
State regulations cited alongside the medical evidence
Updates in minutes each time new records land
Monthly plans start at $250 once you want to go further on a file

Start a free evaluation Review by state

How it works

From first report of injury to a cited chronology

01

Upload the claim file

Medical records, the first report of injury, and carrier correspondence go up as they are.
02

The record is read

Every page is read for causation, restrictions, work status, and the findings that bear on impairment.
03

State rules are applied

The analysis runs against the rules of the state the claim sits in, and cites them next to the records.
04

New records fold in

Add the next set of reports and the chronology updates in minutes, in sequence.
05

Take it to the hearing

Export to PDF or Word for the hearing file, the mediation, or the expert you are about to retain.

Security and compliance

These are your client's medical records. We hold the certifications to match.

HIPAA compliant — Business Associate Agreement countersigned before your first upload
ISO 42001 certified — the international standard for responsible AI management
SOC 2 — independently audited controls for security, availability, and confidentiality
An AI first pass verified by your own attorneys, not routed to outside human reviewers

Model Rule 1.6(c) obliges your firm to vet its vendors, and Rule 1.1 extends the duty of competence to technology. The audit reports and subprocessor list are available during onboarding.

Common questions

How does Superinsight handle rules that differ by state?: Workers' compensation regulations differ by state, so the review applies the rules of the state the claim sits in. Findings do not stop at a citation to the medical record: the state regulations and guidelines that support the position are cited alongside it.
Can it separate a pre-existing condition from a work-related aggravation?: Yes, and that distinction is usually the case. The chronology places treatment before and after the reported injury on one timeline with each entry quoted and cited, so an aggravation is argued from the record rather than asserted over it.
What about MMI and impairment ratings?: The entries that speak to maximum medical improvement, work restrictions, and impairment are surfaced with the treating source and the page they came from, so the documentation supporting a rating is assembled rather than reconstructed.
Can it handle a file with many treating providers?: Yes. Records from every provider are read into one timeline, which is where inconsistencies between them become visible, such as the same week described two ways, or a restriction that one provider lifted and another kept.
What does it cost?: Evaluating cases is free, with no limit on the number of cases or pages, and the chronology updates each time new records arrive. When you want to go further on a file, a monthly plan starts at $250.
How does the review protect worker privacy?: The review is an AI first pass on HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, verified by your own attorneys rather than outside human reviewers, so a worker's records are never routed to a third-party review team. Superinsight is HIPAA compliant, ISO 42001 certified for responsible AI management, and SOC 2 audited.

QME vs AME vs IME
Which evaluation a comp claim needs, and who performs it.
The California comp market
How the largest comp system in the country actually runs.
The Texas comp market
Non-subscription, and what it changes about a claim.
Personal injury
Workplace injuries that also run as a third-party claim.
All practice areas
Every area Superinsight is tuned for, in one place.
Review by state
State-specific rules, deadlines, and record practices.

Get started

Put your next comp file through a free evaluation

Upload the claim file as it stands. You get cited timelines, restrictions, contradictions, and the state rules that apply.