Practice areas

Every case reads the same records. They turn on different lines.

A Social Security file lives or dies on residual functional capacity. A personal injury file lives on the line between accident-related and pre-existing. A malpractice file lives on a delay someone recorded and nobody acted on. Superinsight reads for what your case turns on, and quotes the page it found it on.

Start a free evaluation Book a demo

Free on every case, in every practice area. No limit on cases or pages.

Choose your area

Nine areas, one standard of citation

Each page below covers what the chronology surfaces for that area, how the workflow runs, and the questions firms ask before their first upload.

Disability

Social Security Disability

Records read against the five-step sequential evaluation, with residual functional capacity evidence and Blue Book listing criteria pulled from the chart and cited for the ALJ.

View SSD →

Plaintiff

Personal injury

Causation and damages established from the treatment record, with accident-related care separated from pre-existing conditions before the defense makes the argument for you.

View personal injury →

Defense

Personal injury defense

Pre-existing conditions, treatment gaps, and objective findings identified from the claimant's own records, so valuation rests on the chart rather than on the demand letter.

View defense →

Veterans

Veteran disability

Service treatment records read alongside current care to surface in-service events, continuity of symptoms, and the evidence a nexus opinion has to rest on.

View veteran disability →

Comp

Workers' compensation

Mechanism of injury, work restrictions, maximum medical improvement, and impairment findings pulled out of the treatment record with the page behind each one.

View workers' comp →

Inventory

Mass tort

Exposure windows and qualifying conditions read out of every plaintiff file against the same criteria, so the inventory is comparable when the settlement matrix arrives.

View mass tort →

Med mal

Medical malpractice

Findings recorded and not acted on, delays between order and result, and inconsistencies between notes, laid out in sequence before an expert is retained.

View malpractice →

Experts

Medical examiner services

For IMEs, expert witnesses, and consulting physicians: a structured read of the file before the examination, so review time goes to the opinion rather than the pagination.

View examiner services →

Everything else

Custom solutions

Dockets that do not fit a template: guardianship, life care planning, insurance subrogation, long-term disability, and anything else built on medical records.

View custom solutions →

What stays the same

The output does not change shape between areas

Whatever the docket, the chronology comes back the same way. That is what lets a firm running disability and personal injury side by side keep one work product standard across both.

Quoted, not paraphrased

Entries carry the language the chart used. A summary that reads well and drifts from the record is worse than no summary.

Cited to exhibit and page

Every line points at where it came from, so a finding can be verified in the source in seconds rather than re-litigated.

Missing records flagged

Providers named in the chart whose files never arrived are surfaced, which is usually the fastest thing a chronology tells you.

Updates as records arrive

New records fold into the existing timeline in minutes. The chronology is a live document, not a deliverable you order once.

An AI first pass, verified by you

No outside human review team ever sees the file. Your own attorneys verify the work against the citations.

Export in PDF or Word

Take the chronology into a brief, a demand package, a hearing binder, or an expert's file without rebuilding it.

Security and compliance

One standard of custody, whatever the docket.

  • HIPAA compliant — Business Associate Agreement countersigned before your first upload
  • ISO 42001 certified — the international standard for responsible AI management
  • SOC 2 — independently audited controls for security, availability, and confidentiality
  • An AI first pass verified by your own attorneys, not routed to outside human reviewers

Model Rule 1.6(c) obliges your firm to vet its vendors, and Rule 1.1 extends the duty of competence to technology. The audit reports and subprocessor list are available during onboarding.

Common questions

What if my practice area is not listed?
Upload the file anyway. The chronology is built from the records themselves rather than from a practice-area template, so a case outside the listed areas still comes back quoted and cited. If your docket needs a different output shape, custom workflows are available.
Does the analysis actually change by practice area?
The underlying read is the same; what is surfaced first is not. A Social Security file is read against the five-step sequential evaluation and residual functional capacity. A personal injury file is read for causation and the line between accident-related and pre-existing treatment. A malpractice file is read for deviations and delays.
What does it cost to evaluate a case?
Nothing, in every practice area. Every case you upload is evaluated and returned as a chronology at no cost, with no limit on the number of cases or the pages in each one. When you decide to go further on a file, a monthly plan starts at $250.
Can one firm work across several practice areas?
Yes. Firms that run disability and personal injury side by side use one account for both. Each case is read for what that case turns on, and the output format stays consistent so the work product looks the same across the docket.

Related

Keep reading

Get started

Upload a case and see what your records say

Pick the messiest file on your desk. It comes back as a chronology, quoted and cited, at no cost.

Start a free evaluation Book a demo

Med-legal research library